Food Waste, Social Media, and Gen Z: A Recipe for Sustainable Consumption

Authors

  • Ariyaporn Sakulsom International College, Silpakorn University, Charoen Krung Road, Si Phraya Subdistrict, Bang Rak District, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Attitude toward Sustainable Food Consumption, Food Literacy, Informational Posts, Influencer Endorsements, Social Media, Stimulus-Organism-Response Model, Sustainable Consumption Behavior

Abstract

This study examines how social media influences sustainable food literacy among Thai Generation Z. Utilising the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) model, it investigates the impact of informational posts and influencer endorsements on attitudes toward sustainable food consumption, as well as the subsequent development of meal planning skills, food labeling comprehension, food storage knowledge, and the practical application of sustainability principles. Data were gathered through an online questionnaire distributed on social media platforms used by Thai Gen Z. The sample of 352 Gen Z participated in the online questionnaire process. The findings indicate that influencer endorsements significantly and positively shape attitudes, which, in turn, enhance all four dimensions of sustainable food literacy. Conversely, informational posts show no significant direct or mediated effects. These results highlight that relatable and credible influencers are more effective in promoting sustainable food practices among Gen Z than informational content alone, emphasising the power of culturally engaging, personality-driven communication. The study provides theoretical contribution by refining the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) model in the context of social media’s influence on sustainable food literacy among Thai Gen Z. It fills a gap in the literature by differentiating the effects of two social media stimuli, informational posts and influencer endorsements, on attitudes and food literacy behaviours.

References

FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021.

UNEP. Food waste in Asia Pacific: Current trends and outlook. United Nations Environment Programme. Available online: https://www.unep.org/

Thailand Pollution Control Department. Thailand’s food waste statistics and trends. Pollution Control Department. Available online: https://www.pcd.go.th/

Smith, M. Generation Z and social media: The evolving influence of digital activism. Social Media + Society 2020, 6, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120904427

Jin, S.V.; Muqaddam, A. Influence of influencers on Gen Z’s sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Consumer Behavior 2022, 21, 118-135.

Koay, K.Y.; Pang, P.M.; Chua, A.Y. Social media and food sustainability: How digital content influences consumer choices. Journal of Consumer Research 2022, 48, 1020-1036.

Lim, S.P.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Y. Understanding pro-environmental behaviors: Social media’s role in fostering food sustainability among Gen Z. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2023, 81, 101892, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101892

Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z. Social media as a tool for promoting sustainable food consumption among Generation Z. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2023, 33, 88-103.

Taufique, K.M.R.; Mollah, M.N.; Ehsan, M. Influence of social media on consumer sustainability behavior. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2021, 23, 445-460, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-021-00313-0.

Kim, J.; Lee, K.; Shin, H. Misinformation on social media and food sustainability: The effect of false claims on consumer attitudes. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1-17.

Lou, C.; Yuan, L. How social media influencers affect sustainable consumption behaviors in Gen Z. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2823.

Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2006, 19, 169-194, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3.

Huang, R.; Yang, J.; Wang, L. Economic constraints and sustainable consumption behaviors: A study on the trade-off between sustainability and affordability. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2023, 25, 49-66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00384-3

Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, X. Green consumption behavior: A meta-analysis of social media influence. Sustainability 2021, 13, 512-529, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041512

Kim, H.J.; Han, H. The impact of social media on eco-tourism decisions: The role of influencer endorsements. Sustainable Tourism 2020, 18, 234-246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtras.2020.07.008.

Zhao, L.; Qiu, Z.; Li, Q. Understanding food waste behavior in the digital age: The role of social media. Journal of Business Research 2022, 141, 307-318.

Gunawan, D.D.; Huarng, K.-H. Viral effects of social network and media on consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Business Research 2015, 68, 2237-2241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.004.

Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50, 179-211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

Schwarz, N.; Clore, G.L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45, 513–523, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513.

Cullen, S.; Murphy, R.; Maher, C. Food literacy and the role of nutrition in food choice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2015, 12, 12951–12969, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121012951.

Truman, E.; Martin, R.; Thompson, L. Practical approaches to reducing food waste through improved food literacy. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2017, 41, 632-640.

Vidgen, H.; Gallegos, D. Food literacy: A critical tool in tackling food insecurity. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2014, 38, 72-79.

Jung, J.; Shim, S.W.; Jin, H.S.; Khang, H. Factors affecting attitudes and behavioural intention towards social networking advertising: a case of Facebook users in South Korea. International Journal of Advertising 2016, 35, 248-265, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1014777.

Oakley, R.L.; Salam, A.F. Examining the impact of computer-mediated social networks on individual consumerism environmental behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior 2014, 35, 516-526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.033.

Teoh, C.W.; Koay, K.Y.; Chai, P.S. The role of social media in food waste prevention behaviour. British Food Journal 2021, 124, 1680-1696, https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-04-2021-0368.

Herath, H.M.T.S.; Wanigasuriya, W.A.D.N. Credibility Counts: The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Healthy and Nutritious Food Purchase Intention in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business and Technology 2025, https://doi.org/10.4038/jbt.v9i1.155.

Bazhan, M.; Shafiei Sabet, F.; Borumandnia, N. Development and validation of a questionnaire to examine determinants of consumer intentions to purchase organic food. BMC Nutrition 2023, 9, 74, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00731-y.

Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, M.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. Journal of Business Research 2021, 132, 186-195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067.

Ashoori, M.; Omidvar, N.; Eini-Zinab, H.; Shakibazadeh, E.; Doustmohamadian, A. Development and Validation of Food and Nutrition Literacy Assessment Tool for Iranian High-school Graduates and Youth. Int J Prev Med 2020, 11, 185, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_466_19.

Jin, S.V.; Muqaddam, A.; Ryu, E. Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 2019, 37, 567-579, https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-09-2018-0375.

Liu, X.; Zheng, X. The persuasive power of social media influencers in brand credibility and purchase intention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024, 11, 15, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02512-1.

Kumar, A.; Pandey, M. Social Media and Impact of Altruistic Motivation, Egoistic Motivation, Subjective Norms, and EWOM toward Green Consumption Behavior: An Empirical Investigation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4222.

Muda, M.; Hamzah, M.I. Should I suggest this YouTube clip? The impact of UGC source credibility on eWOM and purchase intention. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 2021, 15, 441-459.

De Veirman, M.; Cauberghe, V.; Hudders, L. Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising 2017, 36, 798-828, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035.

Ki, C.-W.; Cuevas, L.M.; Chong, S.M.; Lim, H. Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020, 55, 102133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133.

Schouten, A.P.; Janssen, L.; Verspaget, M. Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising 2020, 39, 258-281, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898.

Sokolova, K.; Kefi, H. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020, 53, 101742, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011.

Bawden, D.; Robinson, L. The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science 2009, 35, 180–191, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781.

Chen, L.; Haider, M.J.; He, J. Should “green information” be interactive? The influence of green information presentation on consumers’ green participation behavior for driving sustainable consumption of fashion brands. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 470, 143329, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143329.

Hovland, C.I.; Weiss, W. The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 1951, 15, 635-650, https://doi.org/10.1086/266350.

Kollmuss, A.; Agyeman, J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 2002, 8, 239-260, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401.

Carvalho, R.; Lucas, M.R.; Marta-Costa, A. Food Waste Reduction: A Systematic Literature Review on Integrating Policies, Consumer Behavior, and Innovation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3236.

Sheeran, P. Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. European Review of Social Psychology 2002, 12, 1-36, https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Sakulsom, A. (2026). Food Waste, Social Media, and Gen Z: A Recipe for Sustainable Consumption. ICON International Journal of Management, 1(2), 1–18. retrieved from https://so16.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ICON/article/view/4356

Issue

Section

Research Article