Public engagement and key influencing factors in anti-corruption efforts: A quantitative study of Phaya Thai District
Keywords:
anti-corruption, mass media, public participation, regression analysisAbstract
The study aimed to achieve three main objectives: (1) to assess public participation in anti-corruption efforts within the Phaya Thai District, (2) to identify the factors influencing such participation, and (3) to suggest strategies for enhancing public involvement in anti-corruption activities. The research employed a questionnaire as the primary tool for data collection. The questionnaire was validated for accuracy and consistency before being distributed to a randomly selected sample of 397 residents aged 18 and older from Phaya Thai District. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency, mean, percentage, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistics, including multiple regression analysis, to test the research hypotheses. Jamovi statistical software was used for the analysis. The results showed that respondents had a moderate level of participation in preventing corruption in the public sector. The variables examined in the study collectively explained 95.80% of the variance in public participation. The complaint mechanism (FM) emerged as the most influential factor, with a statistically significant effect on public participation (CP) at the .001 level (β = 0.578, p < .001). Other significant factors included the impact of mass media (MI) (β = 0.487, p < .001), awareness of corruption issues (CON) (β = -0.128, p = .003), and access to government information (IA) (β = 0.095, p < .001). In contrast, the variable related to policy and relevant laws (PL) did not significantly affect participation in anti-corruption efforts (β = 0.063, p = 0.083). Based on the findings, it is recommended that public authorities strengthen complaint mechanisms and increase access to government information to enhance public participation in anti-corruption efforts. Additionally, leveraging mass media to raise awareness about corruption issues can further drive engagement. Future research should explore the impact of digital platforms and social media on anti-corruption participation and examine the role of policy reforms in fostering long-term public involvement.
References
Abad, R. (2012). Public participation in governance and anti-corruption efforts: The case of the Philippines. Philippine Political Science Journal, 33(1), 41-59.
Ali, Z., Bhaskar, S., & Sudheesh, K. (2019). Descriptive statistics: Measures of central tendency, dispersion, correlation and regression. Airway, 2(2), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.4103/ARWY.ARWY_37_19
Amegashie, J.A. (2013). Consumers’ Complaints, the Nature of Corruption, and Social Welfare. Forthcoming. CESifo Working Paper Series No.. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2286091
Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7-8), 1801-1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00186-4
Carr, I. (2007). Corruption, legal solutions and limits of law. International Journal of Law in Context, 3(3), 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552307003035
Eastwood, G. L. (2015). Ethical issues in gastroenterology research. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 30, 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12755
Ekeh, P. P. (1975). Colonialism and the two publics in Africa: A theoretical statement. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007659
Felzmann, H. (2009). Ethical issues in school-based research. Research Ethics, 5(3), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500304
Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
Giglietto, F., Iannelli, L., Valeriani, A., & Rossi, L. (2019). ‘Fake news’ is the invention of a liar: How false information circulates within the hybrid news system. Current sociology, 67(4), 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119837536
Heeks, R., & Mathisen, H. W. (2012). Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(5), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10611-011-9361-Y
Heidenheimer, A. J., Johnston, M., & LeVine, V. T. (Eds.). (2011). Political corruption: A handbook. Transaction Publishers.
Horner, D., & Foëx, B. (2009). The ethics of clinical trials. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 10(2), 98 - 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MPAIC.2008.10.001
Hui, E. (2018). Inferential statistics and regressions. In Learn R for Applied Statistics (pp. 101-120). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4200-1_6
Jae-kwang, K. (2023). A study on current issues related to the Anti-Corruption Act. Korea Anti-Corruption Law Association. https://doi.org/10.36433/kacla.2022.6.1.3
Jain, N. (2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492
Jaunky, V., Jeetoo, J., & Bajah, C. (2020). The importance of understanding the anti-corruption legislation to promote corruption reporting: Lessons from Mauritius. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(11), 1282-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1669049
Johnston, M. (2009). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490965
Khemani, S., Dal Bó, E., Ferraz, C., Finan, F. S., Stephenson Johnson, C. L., Odugbemi, A. M., ... & Abrahams, S. D. (2016). Making politics work for development: Harnessing transparency and citizen engagement (No. 106337, pp. 1-281). The World Bank.
Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development, 37(3), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.002
Liu, H. (2008, October). E-Government to combat corruption in the Asia Pacific Region. In 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiCom.2008.2214
McNeil, M., & Mumvuma, T. (2006). Demanding good governance: A stocktaking of social accountability initiatives by civil society in Anglophone Africa. World Bank Institute.
Mukherjee, K. (2020). Basic statistics. In Demystifying Fixed Income Analytics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003045168-3
Mulder, J., & de Bruijne, M. (2019). Willingness of online respondents to participate in alternative modes of data collection. Survey Practice, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2019-0001
Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200-249. https://doi.org/10.1086/517935
Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anti-corruption reforms fail: Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B. (Eds.). (1999). Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104
Quah, J. S. T. (2011). Curbing corruption in Asian countries: An impossible dream? Emerald Group Publishing.
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962933
Shen, Y. (2022). Exploring public participation in anti-corruption reporting system. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Social Science (ISSS 2022) (277-282). https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v16i.473
Sim, J. (2010). Addressing conflicts in research ethics: Consent and risk of harm. Physiotherapy Research International, 15(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.483
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perception Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023/index/nzl
Westcott, C. (2003). Combating Corruption in Southeast Asia, Fighting corruption in Asia: Causes, effects and remedies, edited by Frank-jurgen Richter, John Kidd. N.J.: World Scientific, pp. 237-269.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ronnayut Bongbut, Waiphot Kulachai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.