Royal Thai Navy Mission 2037: A New Paradigm in Maritime Anarchy
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the Future Maritime Operations Concept (FMOC) for the Royal Thai Navy toward the year 2037 (B.E. 2580). The study employs a systematic literature synthesis, integrating classical sea power theories from Mahan and Corbett with postmodern naval theories from Till and Turner. Framed within the school of Offensive Realism, the concept aims to address power construction and management amidst maritime anarchy and great power competition.
The findings indicate a necessary paradigm shift from contemporary Sea Control toward Sea Influence, expanding the traditional scope of Sea Power into postmodern sea power, or Sea Governance. This evolution broadens the naval role in maintaining maritime order, augmenting traditional functions of deterrence, naval presence, and power projection.
The article defines three core strategic missions:
Sea Influence
Naval Presence
Coastal Defense
These missions are executed through the pillars of Deterrence, Combat Victory, and Cooperation. This overarching strategy serves as a mechanism to escape the "Weak State Trap" by leveraging capacity building, a "Smart Two-Handed Policy," transparency, and a redefined concept of power.
Central to this framework is the innovative concept of "Smart Hard Power," which integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI), robotic swarms, and high-performance weaponry. This approach synthesizes quantitative and qualitative power into a robust, effective, and flexible peace assurance system. While the realization of these strategic missions faces challenges regarding personnel development, technological sovereignty, and AI ethics, the FMOC serves as a guarantee for Thailand’s security, peace, and sovereignty within a destabilizing new world order.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the Naval Strategic Studies Center, Naval Education Department, and published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.
Use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
Statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
Authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
Any other republication of the articles requires permission from the journal.
References
บรรณานุกรม (Bibliography)
Angel, R., et al. (2024). Demographics and security in maritime Southeast Asia (Reissued ed.). RAND Corporation.
Bibi, R., & Leonard, M. (2024). The Trump effect: How Europe can build a strategic autonomy. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
Carnegie Europe. (2024). The future of EU-India relations amid the Ukraine crisis. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2023). The evolution of gray zone operations in the South China Sea. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025). The China-Russia nexus: Implications for European security. CSIS Global.
Congressional Research Service. (2024). U.S. security assistance to Ukraine (Report No. R47052). https://crsreports.congress.gov
Cooper, C. A., Chase, M., et al. (2020). Regional responses to U.S.-China competition in the Indo-Pacific: Study overview (Report No. RR-4412-AF). RAND Corporation.
Corbett, J. S. (1911). Some principles of maritime strategy. Longmans, Green and Co.
Department of Defense. (2025). FY 2026 budget request overview. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller).
European Commission. (2024). EU-China relations: A strategic outlook. European Commission Publications.
European Union. (2024). Strategic compass for security and defence. European External Action Service.
Foreign Affairs. (2024). The return of great-power politics. Council on Foreign Relations.
Grossman, D. (2024). How to respond to China's tactics in the South China Sea. RAND Commentary.
Grove, E. (1990). The future of sea power. Routledge.
Hattendorf, J. B. (2013). Naval strategy and policy in the Mediterranean: Past, present and future. Routledge.
Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Little, Brown & Co.