Royal Thai Navy Mission 2037: A New Paradigm in Maritime Anarchy

Main Article Content

ดรณ์ ทิพนันท์

Abstract

This article presents the Future Maritime Operations Concept (FMOC) for the Royal Thai Navy toward the year 2037 (B.E. 2580). The study employs a systematic literature synthesis, integrating classical sea power theories from Mahan and Corbett with postmodern naval theories from Till and Turner. Framed within the school of Offensive Realism, the concept aims to address power construction and management amidst maritime anarchy and great power competition.


The findings indicate a necessary paradigm shift from contemporary Sea Control toward Sea Influence, expanding the traditional scope of Sea Power into postmodern sea power, or Sea Governance. This evolution broadens the naval role in maintaining maritime order, augmenting traditional functions of deterrence, naval presence, and power projection.


The article defines three core strategic missions:



  1. Sea Influence




  2. Naval Presence




  3. Coastal Defense



These missions are executed through the pillars of Deterrence, Combat Victory, and Cooperation. This overarching strategy serves as a mechanism to escape the "Weak State Trap" by leveraging capacity building, a "Smart Two-Handed Policy," transparency, and a redefined concept of power.


Central to this framework is the innovative concept of "Smart Hard Power," which integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI), robotic swarms, and high-performance weaponry. This approach synthesizes quantitative and qualitative power into a robust, effective, and flexible peace assurance system. While the realization of these strategic missions faces challenges regarding personnel development, technological sovereignty, and AI ethics, the FMOC serves as a guarantee for Thailand’s security, peace, and sovereignty within a destabilizing new world order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
ทิพนันท์ ด. (2026). Royal Thai Navy Mission 2037: A New Paradigm in Maritime Anarchy. Naval Strategic Studies Journal, 50(1), 1–36. retrieved from https://so16.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nssc_journal/article/view/3528
Section
Academic Article

References

บรรณานุกรม (Bibliography)

Angel, R., et al. (2024). Demographics and security in maritime Southeast Asia (Reissued ed.). RAND Corporation.

Bibi, R., & Leonard, M. (2024). The Trump effect: How Europe can build a strategic autonomy. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).

Carnegie Europe. (2024). The future of EU-India relations amid the Ukraine crisis. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2023). The evolution of gray zone operations in the South China Sea. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.

Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025). The China-Russia nexus: Implications for European security. CSIS Global.

Congressional Research Service. (2024). U.S. security assistance to Ukraine (Report No. R47052). https://crsreports.congress.gov

Cooper, C. A., Chase, M., et al. (2020). Regional responses to U.S.-China competition in the Indo-Pacific: Study overview (Report No. RR-4412-AF). RAND Corporation.

Corbett, J. S. (1911). Some principles of maritime strategy. Longmans, Green and Co.

Department of Defense. (2025). FY 2026 budget request overview. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller).

European Commission. (2024). EU-China relations: A strategic outlook. European Commission Publications.

European Union. (2024). Strategic compass for security and defence. European External Action Service.

Foreign Affairs. (2024). The return of great-power politics. Council on Foreign Relations.

Grossman, D. (2024). How to respond to China's tactics in the South China Sea. RAND Commentary.

Grove, E. (1990). The future of sea power. Routledge.

Hattendorf, J. B. (2013). Naval strategy and policy in the Mediterranean: Past, present and future. Routledge.

Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Little, Brown & Co.