China–United States Relations and Stability in the Indo-Pacific from the Perspective of the Liberal World Order

Main Article Content

hassachai mangkang

Abstract

This article analyzes China–United States relations within the context of security in the Indo-Pacific region through the lens of Immanuel Kant’s classical liberal theory under the concept of the Liberal World Order. This framework views democracy, liberal capitalism, and international institutions as key factors contributing to stability in international relations. The article argues that China’s past, ongoing, and future rise as a great power constitutes a peaceful power transition, as relations between China and the United States incorporate all three mechanisms identified by the Liberal World Order. These mechanisms help restrain the two great powers from direct confrontation and prevent escalation into a large-scale war in the future. Consequently, in formulating Thailand’s security strategies and policies, the relationship between these two great powers should be considered a critical factor shaping the international environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
mangkang, hassachai. (2025). China–United States Relations and Stability in the Indo-Pacific from the Perspective of the Liberal World Order. Naval Strategic Studies Journal, 44(1), 26–51. retrieved from https://so16.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nssc_journal/article/view/3153
Section
Academic Article

References

๑ John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton

& Company, 2014)

๒ Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press, 1981)

๓ John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, pp. 29-32.

๔ Ibid., pp. 30-32.

๕ Graham Allison,DestinedFor War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s

Trap (Boston: HoughtonMifflin Harcourt, 2017)

๖ John J. Mearsheimer, “Structural Realism,” in International Relations Theories,

nd ed., edited by Tim Dunne,Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (Oxford: Oxford

UniversityPress, 2010), pp. 89-90.

๗ Aaron L. Friedberg, A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle

for Mastery in Asia (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011)

๘ ขจรศักดิ์ สิทธิ, “แนวคิดทฤษฎีความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างประเทศกระแสหลัก,” ใน เอกสารการสอน

ชุดวิชาความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างประเทศ (นนทบุรี: สำ�นักพิมพ์ มสธ., ๒๕๕๕), หน่วยที่ ๓ หน้า ๑๗.

๙ Immanuel Kant, “Toward Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Toward

Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History, edited

and with an introduction by Pauline Kleingeld; translated by David

L. Colclasure (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), pp. 72-73.

๑๐ JohnLocke, Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration,

edited and with an introduction by Ian Shapiro (New Haven: Yale University

Press, 2003)

๑๑ Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,

with a foreword by George Osborne and an introduction by Jonathan B. Wright

(Hampshire: Harriman House, 2007)

๑๒ Ibid., pp. 74-75.

๑๓ Ibid., p. 78.

๑๔ Ibid., p. 80.

๑๕ Ibid., pp. 84-85.

๑๖ Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence: World

politics in Transition, 2nd ed. (Glenview: Harper Collins Publishers, 1989)

๑๗ Bruce Russett, “Liberalism,” in International Relations Theories, 4th ed., edited

by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press,

, p. 69.

๑๘ Ibid., p. 80.

๑๙ G. John Ikenberry, “A New Order of Things?: China, America, and the Struggle

over World Power,” in Will China’s Rise Be Peaceful?: Security, Stability, and

Legitimacy, edited by Asle Toje (Oxford: Oxford University Press,2018), p. 36

๒๐ Ibid., pp. 41-43.