การพัฒนารูปแบบการพัฒนาครูด้วยชุมชนแห่งการเรียนรู้ทางวิชาชีพ (PLC) สำหรับโรงเรียนพระปริยัติธรรม แผนกสามัญศึกษา เขต 8

Naschana  Sangchang; Phramaha Ampol  Dhanapañño (Chaisaree); Chawengsak  Prueksathewet

Authors

Naschana Sangchang Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Thailand
Phramaha Ampol Dhanapañño (Chaisaree) Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Thailand
Chawengsak Prueksathewet Pichayabundit College, Thailand

Abstract

This research aimed to: 1) investigate the current conditions, problems, and priority needs for teacher development in Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Department, Region 8; 2) develop a teacher development model based on the Professional Learning Community (PLC) concept; and 3) implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the developed model. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using mixed methods and was conducted in three phases. In Phase 1, the sample consisted of 320 administrators and teachers. Research instruments included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and a model evaluation form. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the Priority Needs Index (PNI Modified). In Phase 3, a quasi-experimental design (One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design) was conducted with 30 teachers. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and the Dependent Samples t-test.

The findings revealed that: (1) the overall level of teacher development was at a moderate level, with a high priority need for establishing a concrete PLC system; (2) the developed BUDDHA-PLC Model consisted of six components: Buddhist Integration, Unity Collaboration, Development Cycle, Data Reflection, Holistic Learning, and Assessment & Adjustment. The model was evaluated by experts at the highest level of appropriateness; and (3) teachers’ professional competencies after the implementation were significantly higher than before at the .05 level of statistical significance, and overall satisfaction with the model was at the highest level. The results indicate that the developed model is effective and applicable within the context of Phrapariyattidhamma Schools.

References

พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2542. (2542). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 116 ตอนที่ 74 ก หน้า 1–23. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักเลขาธิการคณะรัฐมนตรี.

พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาพระปริยัติธรรม.(2562). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 136 ตอนที่ 50 ก หน้า 1–14. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักเลขาธิการคณะรัฐมนตรี.

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2563). PLC: ชุมชนการเรียนรู้ทางวิชาชีพครู. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิสยามกัมมาจล.

สมาน อัศวภูมิ. (2564). การพัฒนาระบบนิเทศภายในสถานศึกษา. วารสารการบริหารการศึกษา, 17(2), 45–58.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Solution Tree Press. Bloomington, IN.

Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Austin, TX.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.